Baby Bombing; Birth Rates Conquer Countries Too
So much is said of how famous battles conquer lands. We hear all the time of the need to fight foreign armies and develop new eapons. But some people have used the womb as the most powerful weapon of all, with great effect for some ethnic groups, often at the drastic expense of another, which combined with a flow of immigrants, can cause phenomenal demographic change. In order to demonstrate this, I will outline two examples where demographic change brought about by immigration and differential birth rates led to the chaos and conquest of a nation by immigrants. These examples are Lebanon and Kosovo.
1) Lebanon
Lebanon was created in the aftermath of the Ottoman Empires collape as a Christian haven in a sea of Islam. After World War II, a so called "National Pact" was signed stating that the President of Lebanon would always be Christian, and that Christians would be represented in government in a 6:5 ratio to Muslims, reflective of their population breakdown (link). However, in the decades that followed this declaration, Muslims began immigrating into Lebanon, and Muslim women had a birth rate 50% higher than the native Christian birth rate. This began to spell distaster for the once stable and entrepeneurial state of Lebanon, as rapid demographic change began occurring.
As the Muslim population grew rapidly, they demanded political power andIslamic Law, and they formed alliances with leftists, as they do today (see my article "Islam and the Far Left" link) to help over throw the Christian rulers in the so called "National Movement". By 1969, the axis was pushing for a new census which would reduce the Christians to Dhimmitude (link). The leftist-Islamic axis pushed so aggressively, that eventually militia's were formed by the different factions to protect their communities from attacks, such was the instability and friction these leftist-Islamic faction had caused, and the Lebanese army, which may have been able to keep order, began disintegrating along ethno-religious lines. By 1975, the country had been plunged into a state of civil war, triggered by tit-for-tat assassinations.
The fighting was intense, and littered with atrocities, and the Christian community were especially vulnerable given the disinterest of most of the "Christian" West in their plight, contrasting strongly with the way Muslim lands armed and funded the Islamists. In January 1976, the "Saika" Islamic militia attacked the Christian city of Damour, and subjected its virtually un armed Christian citizens to an orgy of rape, mutilation and murder. When the city was eventually liberated, one pregnant woman was found hugging a baby that had had its limbs cut off. Many Christian dead were found with eyes gouged out, and their genitals cut off and stuffed into their mouths (a common practise of humiliation in the Islamic world, often done while the victim is still alive).
The Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) led by Yasser Arafat, which had only been invited into Lebanon in the first place by the leftists (then, as now hopelessly enamoured with the Palestinian "cause") also joined in the slaughter of Christians, and was able to capture huge swathes of Lebanese territory. Had it not been for Israeli intervention on the side of the Christians, who knows how far things could have gone. By 1982, when the war ended, 300,000 (thats right, a third of a million) Christians had been killed.
It can be seen that huge Muslim immigration and high birth rates demographically conquered Lebanon with disastrous results. Today the formerly Christian nation of Lebanon is now 70% Muslim.
2) Kosovo
The popular perception of Kosovo is that of peace loving ethnic Albanians being ruthlessly attacked by fascistic Serbs, a group seemingly addicted to inter- ethnic war. The controlled media and our political leaders painted this picture for us, and used it as the cassus belli for NATO attacks on Serbia in Easter 1999. It has since emerged that the reasons for war were much more cynical than "humantiarian" ones (link for report). In a nutshell, the report claims that the West is trading Western land as "Lebensraum" for Muslims, in exchange for cheap oil. This is despite the fact Montana Governer Schweitzer estimates that the US could go energy self sufficient if it tapped into is vast coal reserves, which can be converted to gasoline for just $1 per gallon, a process we have known about since 1923 (see about half way down this link page)
The truth was very different. Kosovo was actually part of Serbia, and not just any part; it was the very heart of the ancient and noble medieval kingdom of Serbia, and seat of Serbian Orthodox Christianity. However, as time progressed, ethnic Albanians from neighbouring Albania began immigrating en masse to the Serb province of Kosovo. This mass immigration combined with the huge Albanian birth rate, saw the ethnic Albanian population of Kosovo quadruple in less than half a century! Kosovo was granted autonmous status within the former Yugoslavia in 1974, and ethnic Albanians soon had control over the reigns of power thanks to their numbers. They set about passing various arrogant laws, like requiring all road signs to be in Albanian only, thus meaning ethnic Serbs could not read road signs in the heart of their own country. This then escalated, as Albanians raped and assaulted lone Serbs, with the Albanian authorities doing nothing about it.
The Albanians then began culturally erasing the Serb idenitity of Kosovo, as reported by Dr Alex Dragnich, a man of impeccable credentials; he was Cultural Attache and Political Affairs officer at the US Embassy in Belgrade, and is a former professor of political science at Vanderbilt University and Chester Nimitz Professor at the US Naval War College. He reports how Albanian authorities in Kosovo conducted a survey of Kosovan buildings, and listed Serb Orthodox monasteries and churches as "Ordinary buildings", and in some cases even listed them as mosques! Land belonging to the Serb Orthodox church was described as "grazing land" for Albanian farmers and some churches had been ignored, essentially stating that as far as the authorities were concerned, they did not exist. For more on this, read the link (link).
As the decades advanced, Albanians began aggressively campaigning for a "Greater Albania", which would involve a two step process; creating an ethnically pure Kosovo and then by merging this into the state of Albania. As early as 1982, this was put into operation (link). Kosovans also began clamouring for special "minority rights" under Yugoslavia's constitution (even though they accounted for the majority in their province!), rights which the native Serbs were not permitted to have, even though they were the true minority! Race based laws, all favourable to the Albanians followed, further insulating them from (deserved) criticism.
In April 1987, Slobodan Milosevic, newly crowned Communist party leadervisited Kosovo and spoke to hundreds of Serb citizens, tired of the Albanian domination and abuse of them. The comments of the people were haunting, so much so, that just two years after this visit, he went from being an outspoken critic of Serb nationalism to its poster boy. One Serb woman told him that "Either there will be some order in Kosovo or by God we shall take up arms against it". And we all know how that story ended.....
The Serbs had seen birth rates and immigration reduce them to second class citizens in their own country, and had been the victims of consant violent crimes, cultural erasure and accusations of conspiracy; finally, they could take no more, and violence errupted in Kosovo. When the Yugoslav army sent troops in to quell the fighting, NATO bombed Yugoslavia into pulling them out, leaving the native Serb civilians at the mercy of the blood thirsty and ruthless Kosovo Liberation Army, whose atrocities against the Serb people are legion (link)
Conclusion
Demographic change is frequently reported in the media as either being a very mundane thing that we shouldn't worry about, or as something that actually benefits us and "enrichens" us. As we have seen, it is neither, instead it is fuel to the fire of ethnic war and chaos, and as the events in New Orleans have shown, it doesn't take much for socieities to fracture along ethnic lines once a "trigger" occurs, unleashing sometimes centuries of ethnic tension into chaos, violence and even civil war. Yet demographic change is happening as we speak, with every major Western nation in its grip. The USA, a nation that as recently as the 1960's was 90% white, is rapidly transforming into a demographic replica of the third world, a similar story we see repeated across the Western world. Will the authorities act to nip the damage it causes in the bud, or are we in for a very unpleasant future? For that answer, I suggest we talk to a someone from Lebanon.....
1) Lebanon
Lebanon was created in the aftermath of the Ottoman Empires collape as a Christian haven in a sea of Islam. After World War II, a so called "National Pact" was signed stating that the President of Lebanon would always be Christian, and that Christians would be represented in government in a 6:5 ratio to Muslims, reflective of their population breakdown (link). However, in the decades that followed this declaration, Muslims began immigrating into Lebanon, and Muslim women had a birth rate 50% higher than the native Christian birth rate. This began to spell distaster for the once stable and entrepeneurial state of Lebanon, as rapid demographic change began occurring.
As the Muslim population grew rapidly, they demanded political power andIslamic Law, and they formed alliances with leftists, as they do today (see my article "Islam and the Far Left" link) to help over throw the Christian rulers in the so called "National Movement". By 1969, the axis was pushing for a new census which would reduce the Christians to Dhimmitude (link). The leftist-Islamic axis pushed so aggressively, that eventually militia's were formed by the different factions to protect their communities from attacks, such was the instability and friction these leftist-Islamic faction had caused, and the Lebanese army, which may have been able to keep order, began disintegrating along ethno-religious lines. By 1975, the country had been plunged into a state of civil war, triggered by tit-for-tat assassinations.
The fighting was intense, and littered with atrocities, and the Christian community were especially vulnerable given the disinterest of most of the "Christian" West in their plight, contrasting strongly with the way Muslim lands armed and funded the Islamists. In January 1976, the "Saika" Islamic militia attacked the Christian city of Damour, and subjected its virtually un armed Christian citizens to an orgy of rape, mutilation and murder. When the city was eventually liberated, one pregnant woman was found hugging a baby that had had its limbs cut off. Many Christian dead were found with eyes gouged out, and their genitals cut off and stuffed into their mouths (a common practise of humiliation in the Islamic world, often done while the victim is still alive).
The Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) led by Yasser Arafat, which had only been invited into Lebanon in the first place by the leftists (then, as now hopelessly enamoured with the Palestinian "cause") also joined in the slaughter of Christians, and was able to capture huge swathes of Lebanese territory. Had it not been for Israeli intervention on the side of the Christians, who knows how far things could have gone. By 1982, when the war ended, 300,000 (thats right, a third of a million) Christians had been killed.
It can be seen that huge Muslim immigration and high birth rates demographically conquered Lebanon with disastrous results. Today the formerly Christian nation of Lebanon is now 70% Muslim.
2) Kosovo
The popular perception of Kosovo is that of peace loving ethnic Albanians being ruthlessly attacked by fascistic Serbs, a group seemingly addicted to inter- ethnic war. The controlled media and our political leaders painted this picture for us, and used it as the cassus belli for NATO attacks on Serbia in Easter 1999. It has since emerged that the reasons for war were much more cynical than "humantiarian" ones (link for report). In a nutshell, the report claims that the West is trading Western land as "Lebensraum" for Muslims, in exchange for cheap oil. This is despite the fact Montana Governer Schweitzer estimates that the US could go energy self sufficient if it tapped into is vast coal reserves, which can be converted to gasoline for just $1 per gallon, a process we have known about since 1923 (see about half way down this link page)
The truth was very different. Kosovo was actually part of Serbia, and not just any part; it was the very heart of the ancient and noble medieval kingdom of Serbia, and seat of Serbian Orthodox Christianity. However, as time progressed, ethnic Albanians from neighbouring Albania began immigrating en masse to the Serb province of Kosovo. This mass immigration combined with the huge Albanian birth rate, saw the ethnic Albanian population of Kosovo quadruple in less than half a century! Kosovo was granted autonmous status within the former Yugoslavia in 1974, and ethnic Albanians soon had control over the reigns of power thanks to their numbers. They set about passing various arrogant laws, like requiring all road signs to be in Albanian only, thus meaning ethnic Serbs could not read road signs in the heart of their own country. This then escalated, as Albanians raped and assaulted lone Serbs, with the Albanian authorities doing nothing about it.
The Albanians then began culturally erasing the Serb idenitity of Kosovo, as reported by Dr Alex Dragnich, a man of impeccable credentials; he was Cultural Attache and Political Affairs officer at the US Embassy in Belgrade, and is a former professor of political science at Vanderbilt University and Chester Nimitz Professor at the US Naval War College. He reports how Albanian authorities in Kosovo conducted a survey of Kosovan buildings, and listed Serb Orthodox monasteries and churches as "Ordinary buildings", and in some cases even listed them as mosques! Land belonging to the Serb Orthodox church was described as "grazing land" for Albanian farmers and some churches had been ignored, essentially stating that as far as the authorities were concerned, they did not exist. For more on this, read the link (link).
As the decades advanced, Albanians began aggressively campaigning for a "Greater Albania", which would involve a two step process; creating an ethnically pure Kosovo and then by merging this into the state of Albania. As early as 1982, this was put into operation (link). Kosovans also began clamouring for special "minority rights" under Yugoslavia's constitution (even though they accounted for the majority in their province!), rights which the native Serbs were not permitted to have, even though they were the true minority! Race based laws, all favourable to the Albanians followed, further insulating them from (deserved) criticism.
In April 1987, Slobodan Milosevic, newly crowned Communist party leadervisited Kosovo and spoke to hundreds of Serb citizens, tired of the Albanian domination and abuse of them. The comments of the people were haunting, so much so, that just two years after this visit, he went from being an outspoken critic of Serb nationalism to its poster boy. One Serb woman told him that "Either there will be some order in Kosovo or by God we shall take up arms against it". And we all know how that story ended.....
The Serbs had seen birth rates and immigration reduce them to second class citizens in their own country, and had been the victims of consant violent crimes, cultural erasure and accusations of conspiracy; finally, they could take no more, and violence errupted in Kosovo. When the Yugoslav army sent troops in to quell the fighting, NATO bombed Yugoslavia into pulling them out, leaving the native Serb civilians at the mercy of the blood thirsty and ruthless Kosovo Liberation Army, whose atrocities against the Serb people are legion (link)
Conclusion
Demographic change is frequently reported in the media as either being a very mundane thing that we shouldn't worry about, or as something that actually benefits us and "enrichens" us. As we have seen, it is neither, instead it is fuel to the fire of ethnic war and chaos, and as the events in New Orleans have shown, it doesn't take much for socieities to fracture along ethnic lines once a "trigger" occurs, unleashing sometimes centuries of ethnic tension into chaos, violence and even civil war. Yet demographic change is happening as we speak, with every major Western nation in its grip. The USA, a nation that as recently as the 1960's was 90% white, is rapidly transforming into a demographic replica of the third world, a similar story we see repeated across the Western world. Will the authorities act to nip the damage it causes in the bud, or are we in for a very unpleasant future? For that answer, I suggest we talk to a someone from Lebanon.....

3 Comments:
Excellent article. I gave a link to it on my blog. Hope that’s OK.
I don’t think that the British people will wake up and realise that ‘diversity’ isn’t a source of “strength and enrichment” - or that “race doesn’t matter” - but rather a source of tension and conflict, until it’s too late.
At the start of this century, whites made up one in three of the world’s population. Now it’s one in twelve, and we are having only one in twenty of the world’s babies. The Birth Rates (Children per mother) for 2003 for Britain are: Somali - 6.98; Nigerian - 6.72; Pakistani - 4.1; Bangladeshi - 3.17; Indian - 2.91; English - 1.66. Add to that mass immigration and miscegenation, and it’s a recipe for whites to become a minority in Britain within my lifetime.
What do you mean by “The controlled media”? Do you mean Jewish controlled, Liberal controlled, government controlled, or what?
Simon
"What do you mean by “The controlled media”? Do you mean Jewish controlled, Liberal controlled, government controlled, or what?"
My comment; What matters is what the control is meant to achieve. If it was by pygmie goats it doesnt matter its a bad thing.
It does annoy me when people talk of "the jewish controled media" because it isnt the fact that there are a lot of jews in the media that matters, the problem is its disgusting bias. Being born a Jew doesnt make you a bad person; we have Jewish councelors even, and are all the better for it. No, what matters is the ideas behind the controllers.
In the case of the government, i firmly believe that protecting its own neck is secondary. It really does have an insatiable demand for power, to fuel its ego. How else could we account for such insane targets? they want to see their power in action. A targets to the government is like a mirror, that always lies and says "you are the prettiest of them all", and the media helps a part of their group phsycology believe it, proportionally to the control the head of the group controls the media. Power directly makes them feel good.
"liberal controlled" is actually a misnomer, for left control read government control. For arguments sake lets put one leg and two arms of the lippy dems in the left camp, and leave the other leg dangling for prosterity.
Ho hum. I write longer posts on others blogs than i write on my own sometimes. If you dont mind Micheal, ill link to this article from my blog.
best,
Gareth.
"My comment; What matters is what the control is meant to achieve. If it was by pygmie goats it doesnt matter its a bad thing" - Gareth
Couldn't have said it better myself. The fact is the controlled media intends to keep us in the dark about how profound a danger demographic change is.
And I don't have a problem with people linking to this article :)
Michael
Post a Comment
<< Home